Text
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 101,821,493 and KRW 101,821,386. From December 1, 2014, and Defendant A.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s credit guarantee agreement and guarantee accident occurred. (1) The Plaintiff and Defendant A entered into a contract with Defendant A to provide credit guarantee for the principal and interest of loan to be borne by the Industrial Bank of Korea as listed in the table 1, but to pay damages for delay as determined by the Plaintiff from the date of performance of the guaranteed obligation to the date of full payment. Under each of the above credit guarantee agreements, the principal of each of the above credit guarantee agreements (an enterprise requesting a credit guarantee) and the principal of each of the above credit guarantee agreements entered the principal of each of the above credit guarantee agreements into a credit guarantee agreement and the principal of each of the above credit guarantee agreements into a “C representative A” respectively. Defendant A received a loan from an enterprise bank as listed in table 2.
Table 23) Defendant A caused a credit guarantee accident on November 19, 2014 due to bad treatment, and the Plaintiff performed its surety obligation on behalf of the Industrial Bank of Korea as listed in Table 3 below. From December 1, 2012 determined by the Plaintiff, the rate of delay damages up to December 1, 2012 is 12% per annum, and on December 1, 2014, Defendant A collected KRW 327,130 from Defendant A to repay the claim under the guarantee contract No. 1 above. The sum of the subrogated balance of the guarantee contract No. 1 above to Defendant A and the fixed amount of damages pursuant to the above recovered amount is 59,268,398 won (=59,268,291 won).
B. Transaction 1 between the Defendants 1) Defendant A is the “instant store” in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, the F in Seopo-si, Seopo-si (hereinafter “instant store”).
(C) On August 20, 2014, Defendant B operated the land wholesale business with the trade name of “C”, and operated the business by putting up the signboard on which “H/AX: H/AX” and “I. (2) Defendant B, on August 20, 2014, intended to purchase the trade name of “C, one ton of the freezing tower, one ton of the freezing tower, one ton of the freezing tower, two of the freezing storage units, and 50,000,000 won of the store.”