logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2015.11.12 2014가합5679
구상금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant A’s KRW 771,94,127 and KRW 563,856,082 from October 22, 2014, KRW 74,853,757.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into a credit guarantee agreement with Defendant A (hereinafter “Agreement Nos. 1, 2, and 3”) and issued a credit guarantee agreement with the content as set forth below to the Daegu Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Corporation name”).

[Attachment 1] 250,00,000 won (25,000,000 won) 2,22 February 22, 2010 (255,000,000 won, February 17, 2015) 130,00,000 won for guarantee period (final guarantee period) 13,00,00,000 won for guarantee period (final guarantee period) 14, 200,000 won for guarantee period (212,50,000 won on June 14, 2013)

B. As to promissory notes issued by Defendant A, the Plaintiff made a credit guarantee agreement (hereinafter “Agreement No. 4, 5, and 6”) between Defendant A and Defendant A, and issued a credit guarantee statement with the following [Attachment 2].

[Attachment 2] F. F. F. F. 140,000,000 won on August 1, 2014, 2015, Jul. 31, 2015, 2015: C. 3H on July 31, 2015, C. 3 H. 1.50,000,000 won on August 1, 2015, 2015

C. On September 29, 2014, when a credit guarantee accident occurred with Defendant A’s watch, the Plaintiff subrogated to the Daegu Bank for KRW 569,360,798, and KRW 10,694,867, and KRW 32,616,087, in accordance with the Agreement on November 27, 2014 pursuant to the Agreement on November 28, 2014 pursuant to the Agreement on December 4, 2014, pursuant to the Agreement, the Plaintiff subrogated for KRW 7,501,189, respectively for the New Pharma pursuant to the New Pharma pursuant to the Agreement on November 28, 2014.

After collecting the amount of KRW 5,531,716 from Defendant A, the Plaintiff collected the amount of KRW 5,531,716 from Defendant A, and the remainder of the amount of subrogated payment related to the 1,2 and3 agreements was KRW 563,829,082, and the amount of damages for the amount of recovery was determined based on the rate of damages.

E. The Plaintiff entered into a bill insurance contract with IMP Korea and subordinate Korea in a transaction with Defendant A (hereinafter “Agreement 7,8,9” according to the sequence in attached Table 3.

arrow