A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power and Crime Punishment] On November 26, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for the crime of interference with business by the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 2014.

The Defendant is a person who resides in the 1st International Passenger Terminal Lodging (hereinafter referred to as the “cab platform”) in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, and engages in taxi business.

Since 2004, the Defendant joined a taxi platform in order to serve as a long-distance customer, organized a “friendly meeting” by organizing a “friendly meeting,” and, in return, assigned the long-distance hand to the members of the said terminal (as a result, assigned to a long-distance passenger who enters the outside). In return, the distance from which long-distance customers move to a long-distance customer and the corresponding taxi expenses, the Defendant received 1 to 30,000 won in return for the allocation of customers, and he was waiting around the taxi platform while waiting in and around the taxi platform while entering the outside, other than a member of the “friendly meeting,” while leaving the taxi platform in order to board the long-distance customer.

The Defendant, while engaging in the taxi business in the aforementioned manner, obstructed the victim E’s taxi business by force on the taxi platform around September 22, 2013, and obstructed the victim E’s taxi business by the same method around August 23, 2013.

‘Unconvictedd' was prosecuted for criminal facts and tried for trial.

Notwithstanding the fact that the defendant had been investigated and tried in the above case, he continues to conduct the taxi business in the above way, and takes money from the taxi engineer in the same manner as follows, and took a retaliation against the taxi engineer who made a statement unfavorable to the defendant at an investigative agency, and the defendant at the trial of the above case.