logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.09.20 2019고단289
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was dead from around June 13, 2018 between the victim B (n, 34 years of age) and the victim B (n, 34 years of age).

On June 14, 2018, at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 01:55, the Defendant taken the form of sexual intercourse with the Defendant using the Defendant’s mobile phone image shooting function in which the victim was sexually related with the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of another person who may cause sexual humiliation or shame on the defendant's cell phone camera against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. Each police statement made to B (including twice) and D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A report on the analysis of digital evidence;

1. Investigation report (Details of restoration of a domain);

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserts that he/she has taken the form of sexual intercourse with the victim's consent.

On the other hand, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court and the circumstances acknowledged by this court, i.e., ① the victim has consistently made a specific statement to the effect that “the defendant taken the sex image of this case against the victim’s will since the investigation agency to this court,” ② the victim, who is her husband, appears to have no reason to allow the defendant to take the sex image, ③ if the victim consented to take the sex image, such as the defendant’s assertion, then the victim was confirmed immediately after the photographing, and ④ the victim did not confirm the sex image immediately after the photographing of this case ④ The victim stated to the effect that “the victim was taken as a kind of insurance to be exempted from the obligation by showing the sex image of this case to him at the time when approximately one month elapsed after the photographing of this case.”

arrow