logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.13 2017나3267
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following determination as to the assertion added by the defendant to the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The part added by the Defendant asserts to the effect that, among the goods supplied by the Plaintiff, the goods can not be paid for the goods since the expiration of the period of distribution or the stuffed goods and the mixture of defective goods. However, there is no evidence to calculate the amount to be excluded from the price of the goods, such as specific defects existing in the goods supplied by the Plaintiff, the quantity of defective goods, and the price of the goods supplied by the Plaintiff. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim is accepted on the ground of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.

arrow