logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.07.02 2014고단1600
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 6 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 4 months, Defendant C’s fine of 2.5 million won, Defendant D and E, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, B, C, D, and E

A. Defendants A and the role of the Defendants are the president who has a total of 29 school bathing rooms on the first floor of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I and who operates a sexual traffic business establishment called “J”. Defendant B, as the managing director of the said business establishment, took charge of the overall management of the said business establishment on behalf of the visually impaired Party A, and Defendant C, D, and E play the role of guiding customers as employees of the said business establishment.

B. Defendants in collusion with the above “J” around December 19, 2013, around 22:40, around December 19, 2013, Defendant C received 400,000 won by credit card when adding up the price for the commercial sex acts of K and its working-level L from K and its working-level L, and Defendant D and E received 11 copies of L, and let female employees go up to their body. Defendant D and E receive 400,000 won in collusion with the Defendants, at the same time, at the same place, and at the same time and place, receive 40,000 won as above, and guide K to attend once with K, at the same place as 23:10 on the same day, Defendant C received 19,000 won from N and 15,000 won from N and 15,000 won from N and 15.5.

The Defendants conspired to commit such acts as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. On December 19, 2013, Defendant F promised Defendant F to receive KRW 80,00 per customer in return for sexual traffic from the president of the said business establishment at the fourth room of the J on December 19, 2013, and provided sexual traffic with K and one-time sexual intercourse to be a customer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol against L, M, K, N, andO;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the defendant A and B who choose a sentence concerning the criminal facts;

arrow