beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of one year and fine of 7,00,000,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment of six months and fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
On April 1, 2015, A and E are indicated in the facts charged in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government case No. 2016 High Order No. 1076 (Defendant B and C) of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building No. 2016, but according to the adopted evidence, it appears to have been written in error as an office address rather than the place where sexual traffic was committed, and there is no disadvantage to Defendant B or Defendant C’s exercise of its substantial right to defense, and thus
The number of rooms Nos. 516, 1002, 1307, and 1418 are leased, and they are joint owners operating the above establishment, such as advertising of officetels sexual traffic business establishments on the Internet. From April 20, 2015, Defendant B was the main office of the above establishment, Defendant C was the night office of the above establishment from May 30, 2015.
1. While Defendant A, along with E, managed the said Ftel 4 rooms and female employees, Defendant A, on June 2, 2015, reported the Internet advertisements of KRW 130,000 from the said officetel 1418 around June 2, 2015, demanded female employees I to have sexual intercourse with the said female employees after receiving 130,000 won of sexual traffic, around June 9, 2015, Defendant A reported the Internet advertisements around 17:30, and contacted the nameless male customers who found, received 150,000 won of sexual traffic, and provided female employees J and sexual intercourse with his/her employees from April 1, 2015 to June 9, 2015.
Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with E, etc. to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.
2. Defendant B and the Defendants, in collusion with A and E on June 9, 2015, received KRW 1.50,000 from an unwritten male customer who reported and contacted Internet advertisement in the vicinity of the above Ftel from the unwritten male customer, and Defendant B, from April 20, 2015 to June 9, 2015, ordered female employees J to have the above male and female workers sexual intercourse with the above male.