1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,487,495 as well as 5% per annum from March 27, 2013 to September 21, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant’s tort against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant tort”) committed on March 27, 2013, the Defendant considered that the Plaintiff was working in the D D restaurant located in Ma-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, and that “it is necessary to write off such Ma-do Ma-ro Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma-Ma

B. The Defendant’s criminal judgment against the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for four months by the Gwangju District Court’s 2013 Gocheon1587, and the Defendant appealed as the Gwangju District Court’s 2014No1966, but the appellate court dismissed this and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant seeking compensation for damages arising from the instant tort by Gwangju District Court 2014Gahap3179. The Plaintiff claimed that the Plaintiff suffered bodily assessment by filing an application for physical assessment on the left-hand ear and the left-hand ear due to the instant tort. The result of physical assessment that “the rate of loss of labor capacity is about 50% and the left-hand ear, and it is impossible to make accurate assessment by considering the need for re-evaluation after surgery,” and that “the rate of loss of labor capacity is about the inside and the left-hand ear and the left-hand ear, and that it is impossible to make accurate assessment by considering the significant difference in the subjective opic test and objective opic test on April 10, 2014.”

Since then, the above court.