logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.12 2014노1966
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

The defendant does not have any misunderstanding of facts only once he or she made one time at the time.

In addition, the victim's injury, excluding the scarcity of scarcity, is not caused by the defendant. The victim's injury is not caused by the defendant.

The court below's sentence of unfair sentencing (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In full view of the following circumstances as revealed in the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court on the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) the victim made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below that he was assaulted by the defendant several times; (ii) the prosecutor made a statement that “the victim was not directly considered by the person who was the victim,” and (iii) the court of the court of the court below made a statement that “the person who was the victim was not directly considered by the victim,” and (iv) the witness Q and X made a statement that “the person who was the witness was the victim was not memory at the time of the court of the court of the court below,” and (v) the defendant made a statement that the victim was the victim at the time of the first time (in particular, the victim stated that X was the person who could objectively make a statement on the fact that only one occasion is the victim. Therefore, the above argument by the defendant is reasonable.

(However, this is merely an indirect fact in the crime of injury, and thus, ought to be corrected as seen later without reversal. The lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court on the assertion that there is no causal link between the remaining injury except for the external trauma heat of the anti-scale. In so doing, the following facts can be acknowledged.

On March 27, 2013, the Defendant passed a drinking house around 21:00, at one time on the left side of the victim.

The injured party on March 22, 2013

arrow