logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.08.12 2015가단28019
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants each of the KRW 15,000,000 to the Plaintiff, as well as 5% per annum from June 26, 2015 to August 12, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a vehicle with C and D (not less than 26 passengers, hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”).

(2) As an employee of Defendant B from June 8, 2014, he/she is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff. Defendant B is the president of the E language Institute, and Defendant A, as an employee of Defendant B from June 8, 2014, has been driving a transit bus of the said English Institute as an employee of the F-F-type vehicle owned by him/her (hereinafter “Defendant

나. 1) 피고 A은 2015. 6. 1. 17:03경 피고 차량을 운전하여 구미시 형곡동 기업은행 앞 신호등 없는 네거리 교차로에 이르러 형곡4주공아파트 쪽에서 형일초등학교 방향의 편도 2차로에 설치되어 있는 보행자신호등 없는 횡단보도의 일부를 침범한 상태에서 피고 차량을 정차하여 학원생인 G(H생)을 하차시켰다. 당시 피고 A은 운전석에 그대로 앉아 있었다. 2) 한편, I은 원고 차량을 운전하여 위 도로의 1차로를 따라 위 하차 지점을 진행하면서 일시 정지나 서행하지 않았고, 그리하여 피고 차량 앞에서 우측에서 좌측으로 횡단보도를 횡단하던 G을 충격하여 튕겨나가게 한 뒤 계속하여 원고 차량의 우측 앞, 뒤 바퀴로 G을 역과하였다.

As a result, G died at the site of brain damage accompanied by brain escape.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) and G are “the deceased” (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

On June 25, 2015, the Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 300 million to the deceased’s inheritors.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, 2, 5, 6, 7-6, and Eul evidence 18-1

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff 1’s accident of this case, in addition to the negligence of the Plaintiff 1’s driver, was caused by the Defendants’ negligence, which violated the duty of the Road Traffic Act, etc. to be observed by the operators of children’s commuting vehicles, by operating a private teaching institute or driving a vehicle with the driver’s heavy negligence, and by safely cutting the road after getting the vehicle.

arrow