1. The Defendant’s rejection disposition against the Plaintiff on March 6, 2017 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The project name of the Central Land Tribunal (10 expropriation, 0930) project approval and public notice A) project approval: B (hereinafter “instant project”): The Defendant’s employee D and E visited F at the time of permanent residence of the Plaintiff’s house to investigate the actual status of the Plaintiff’s livestock breeding, and conducted a fact-finding survey on February 3, 2010.

B) During the fact-finding survey conducted on February 3, 2010, the Plaintiff was found to have raised pigs 950 heads, 130 maws, ducks 30 maws, and 35 maws. The Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”).

(C) On March 11, 2010, the goods protocol prepared in accordance with Article 14(1) of this Act, entered the Plaintiff’s raising of 950 heads of pigs, 130 heads of pigs, 130 heads of ducks, 30 heads of ducks, 35 heads of pigs, and 35 heads of pigs. On April 1, 2010, the appraisal conducted in order to acquire a consultation, verified that the Plaintiff raised 330 heads of pigs, 10 heads of pigs, 30 heads of pigs, 10 heads of ducks, 30 heads of ducks, 35 heads of pigs, and 35 heads of pigs. The appraisal corporation, Pacific, and one appraisal corporation, each of which conducted an appraisal, was assessed as follows.

The Central Land Expropriation Commission's ruling on the actual condition quo 175,000 1,830,000 1,830,000 1,830,830,8300 1,830,830,000 1,830,000 360,000 360,600 360,000 360,000 360,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,00 175,00 1,000 1,000 1,667 3,000 3,005,315,360,360,3631,631, 206.