A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 23, 2017, between 01:00 to 01:15, the Defendant: (a) sent the victim B (42 years of age) who was in India, on the part of the member of Ansan-si, on the back 40-ro of the Handong Elementary School, the Defendant used the victim B (42 years of age) for flying the total of QA1601389, a total of BB carbon (42 years of age), which was in danger of getting on and getting on the spke car franc, in Ansan-si, the members of Ansan-si, and assaulted the victim on the part of the victim’s left part.

2. Victims D and E: The same day: 01:27 Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

9. From the Bosung Flaz’s shooting distance, the victim D (Woo, 18 years old) and the victim E (Woo, 18 years old), who is a pedestrian, committed violence against the victims.

3. Around 02:04 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the Victim F by launching a passenger car to the Victim F (29 tax) who is a pedestrian, on the front of the shooting distance of the Handong Housing at the time of Ansan-si, Nowon-gu, the Defendant: (b) committed assault against the Victim F (29 tax).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to G, H and I;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the disposition of reported cases 112;

1. Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation (no criminal record has been committed against the defendant, but there is a high possibility of intentional criticism and criticism, and no agreement has been reached with the victims) is more than 1.