A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim D (mar, 26 years old) who was waiting for the crosswalk to stop the crosswalk while driving the bnd in the north-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu, west-gu; (b) launched the car in front of C and launched the bnd-down gun, which was in front of C, and was in front of his usual storage, and launched the bnd-down to the right side of the victim by driving the bnd-down gun, which is dangerous things in the vehicle, on one occasion after the end of the way with the vehicle.

In addition, from the above date to May 30, 2017, the Defendant assaulted four victims in total in the above manner, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, D, F, and G;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of damaged parts;

1. Shot gun (4 out of the aggregate) collected at the site; and

1. Data on images of CCTVs at each site;

1. Application of statutes on records of seizure and lists of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260 (1) and 260 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act: The defendant merely resells the defendant's vehicle at a disadvantage on the ground that it is very poor that the nature of the crime is high, such as launching a non-carbon gun, which is a dangerous object against the unspecified women on the street, and assaulting many women, etc.; the defendant is highly likely to be subject to serious injury if he is in compliance with the action of grade such as the snow or trees of the people, etc.; the circumstances favorable to the defendant's failure to agree with the victims are against the defendant's wrong recognition that the defendant is against the victim's fault; the victims are not significantly different; the defendant's age, sex, sex, family relationship, family environment, and family environment at the above circumstances.