1. The defendant shall pay 27,100,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. The Defendant’s order from September 30, 2014 to January 1, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 20, 2012, the Defendant joined the Plaintiff Company, which is a marriage brokerage business and marriage information provider, and worked as the head of the education team on October 19, 2012, retired from Korea on October 19, 2012. On November 4 of the same year, the Defendant joined D Co., Ltd. and retired from Korea on January 2013.

B. Around January 28, 2013, the Defendant drafted an entrustment contract and a written pledge of business confidentiality with the Plaintiff Company’s re-entering the period of entrustment from January 28, 2013 to December 31, 2014; and the entrustment contract and a written pledge of business confidentiality, with 15% of the sales amount.

C. On July 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) changed the assignment to the Plaintiff Company’s business division strategic alliance team; (b) prepared a written employment contract setting the period of the employment contract from August 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014; (c) drafted a written employment contract setting the annual salary of KRW 32 million per year; and (d) drafted a written written pledge on the prohibition of transfer; and (c) drafted a written written pledge on the prohibition of transfer.

(hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement of this case"). A written pledge is so known that it is too much about the confidential information of the plaintiff company, such as education, business, membership information, and system, while in office of the plaintiff company.

Therefore, I will not be employed in the same category for three years at the time of retirement of the Plaintiff Company. If you violate the above, I will pay 1 million won per day to the Plaintiff Company.

From November 22, 2013 to December 2, 2013, the Defendant immediately retired from the Plaintiff Company, and was employed by C (hereinafter referred to as “C”) as the same company as the Plaintiff Company on January 2, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 5 evidence, Eul 1 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant transferred from the plaintiff company to C, the same kind of company, after withdrawal, must pay damages in accordance with the agreement of this case.

B. The defendant's assertion is that E's abusive and sexual harassment, which is the adviser of the plaintiff company, bears heavy duties, and withdraws from membership.