logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.08 2016가합38382
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. On March 26, 2008, the Plaintiff was established and its purpose is to manufacture and sell steel removal equipment. Defendant A served as C from March 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015, and Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) established for the purpose of selling high pressure valves, etc. on March 9, 2015.

A confidentiality pledge of March 3, 2014

1. I, while holding office, undertake not to leak or disclose any company's secrets which they came to know while being in office against the company's will after retirement and not to use them for unjust purposes.

2. Recognizing that the principal's right to trade secrets created in relation to his/her duties is vested in the company.

3. At the time of his retirement, I swear to return all the data pertaining to the secrets of the company he held while in office.

On February 28, 2015, a written pledge of confidentiality for the business of the retired on February 28, 2015

1. No person concerned shall use, disclose or divulge trade secrets of a company which he/she has learned while in office against his/her will for one year after retirement;

2. The principal shall return all the data obtained in respect of the Company's trade secrets until their retirement.

3. Other efforts shall be made in good faith to observe the trade secrets of the company.

B. On March 3, 2014 and February 28, 2015, Defendant A made a covenant of confidentiality with the following content to the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 9, and 10, and the plaintiff's assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings as to the purport of the whole pleadings, from November 2014, the plaintiff made the defendant A as a person in charge of the defendant A, and made a review of the process system-related technology for the construction of the Denting process of the steel company's product manufacturing process of the Denting company's products by removing the mountain bed in contact with the oxygen, and by removing the mountain bed in contact with the oxygen. On January 2015, the plaintiff conducted a review of the process-related technology for the construction of the Denting company's product manufacturing process.

arrow