The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In order to prevent the victim who was detrimental to himself/herself, the defendant is only having contacted the victim's right and does not have contact the victim's right hand.

B. The Defendant’s act of self-defense constitutes self-defense under Article 21(1) of the Criminal Act by exposing out his/her left door to protect himself/herself by going against the victim’s self-defense against his/her talking with the victim.

2. Determination

A. On November 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, at the D Park in the Government-si C around 2012, the Defendant got out of the 5 balance of revenues and expenditures, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment for the next victim, while making a conflict with the victim E at D Park in the Government-si C; and (b) thereby, the Defendant got out of the 5 balance of revenues and expenditures.

B. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged based on the Defendant’s partial statement, E’s legal statement, police statement, and the injury diagnosis statement.

다. 당심의 판단 1) 피고인은 원심에서 당심에 이르기까지 일관하여, 피고인이 발로 피해자 E의 다리를 차기는 하였으나 피해자의 손가락을 다치게 하지는 않았다는 취지로 변소하고 있다. 2) 피해자는 피고인의 발에 왼손을 맞아 다쳤다는 것이므로, 이 사건 공소사실이 유죄로 인정되기 위하여는 피고인이 발로 피해자의 왼손을 찼다는 점이 증명되어야 할 것인데, 이에 부합하는 직접적인 증거로는 피해자 E의 수사기관 및 원심 법정에서의 진술이 있으므로, 피해자 E의 진술의 신빙성에 관하여 본다.

3 In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below and the following circumstances recognized by the records, the question of credibility of each of the above statements made by the victim E cannot be ruled out.

(1) The victim shall be limited to the making soup and making soup with F as well as F who is a member of the same Ethston Association.