logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.10 2014고단6916
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 6916] On January 10, 2014, the Defendant concluded a loan agreement with the content of the principal and interest of KRW 15,6490,000 per month by taking out loans from KRW 15,5550,000 per month when purchasing a “ra” vehicle from the 1038-3 Seoul Highest 6th Southern Franca, a company located in the 6th Southern Franca, a 1038-3 Southern Franca, and then taking out loans from the 1036th place of business.

However, the defendant, after purchasing the above vehicle, did not think of the cost of living and did not have the intent and ability to repay the loan according to the agreement because there was no particular property or income at the time.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the damaged company, was given a loan of KRW 15 million by the victimized company.

[2014 Highest 7084] The Defendant is a person who was working as a business employee at a car D agency located in the Young-si area from September 2008 to January 2013.

1. On December 2012, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim E concluded a false statement that “The victim E works as a member of an infant vehicle business, with which he/she has set up his/her performance, lends his/her name to the victim E. The vehicle is released after entering into a provisional contract and shipping the vehicle, and then the contract is revoked by the vehicle company.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendant concluded a vehicle sales contract under the name of the victim by lending the vehicle from the victim, and received a loan from the Hyundai Capital Capital in the name of the victim, he/she was planned to sell the above vehicle immediately and use it as his/her debt repayment and cost of living. The Defendant was in excess of his/her liability, such as bonds with approximately KRW 70 million at the time, and thus, the Defendant did not

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, received an identification card from the victim, etc., and issued it on December 6, 2012.

arrow