1. The Defendants shall terminate the trust on April 1, 2017 with respect to each share indicated in the separate sheet among the 41m2 in the RR 41m2 in the Plaintiff.

In addition to the purport of the entire argument in the statement in Evidence Nos. 1 through 4, ① the Plaintiff’s father, Defendant B, Defendant C, and T, the father of the remaining Defendants, have owned sectionally owned the RR large 771 square meters (hereinafter “R land before subdivision”). ② The RR land before subdivision is divided into the RR large 41 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), U large 154 square meters, V large 244 square meters, and W large 338 square meters; ③ was the sectional owner of the part where the instant land is located; ④ the Plaintiff was the delivery of a duplicate of the instant complaint of this case, and ④ the Plaintiff terminated mutual title trust with respect to the instant land (the Defendant was finally served on April 1, 201); ⑤ the Defendants’ share in the instant land as of May 31, 2017 can be recognized as identical facts.

As a duplicate service of this case, mutual title trust on the land of this case between the plaintiff and the remaining sectional owners was terminated.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on April 1, 2017 with respect to each portion of the instant land indicated in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.