beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 340"
1. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the following as “D” and “F, etc.” in the customer name column of the applicant for the mobile phone purchase at the “C” store operated by the Defendant in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) using a tamp-type tamp-type tamp-type tamp-type (E and model name: SM-N920S-320G) without D’s consent; and (c) made signature on the “F, etc.” in the name column of the applicant for the mobile phone purchase; and (d) forged and exercised the “C mobile phone purchase application” in the name of SK Telecom Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. to an employee under the name of the non-indicted of the date of birth, who is aware of such fact, by sending the forged document by facsimile; and (d) forged and exercised the “D mobile phone purchase application” in the name of D, a private document related to rights and duties.
In addition, around March 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) forged and used the mobile phone name “application for change of 6S/IM” and 1 copy of each “the end-of-end transaction agreement” in the following ways: (b) around April 1, 2016: (c) two copies of “the mobile phone subscription application” in the name of D for each mobile phone (H and H 6S -16G); (d) around June 16, 2016; and (e) one copy of each “the application for change of 6S / IM” and one copy of each “the end-of-end transaction agreement.”
2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, submitted to each employee in the name of the victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd., one copy of the application for change of the falsified mobile phone entrance, which was forged as described in paragraph 1, even without obtaining D’s consent on opening of the mobile phone, and submitted one copy of the application for change of the falsified mobile phone entrance as described in paragraph 1, and acquired pecuniary benefits of KRW 3,636,760 in total from the injured party, such as reimbursement for the short term and unpaid communication fees.
"2017 Highest 1117"
3. On October 23, 2015, the Defendant is from the sales store of “C” operated by the Defendant in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), and I.