A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 10 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 20, 2002, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million from the Daegu District Court on December 3, 2010 to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Chungcheong District Court’s Chungcheong Branch on April 4, 2005, a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime in the same court on October 1, 2010, a fine of KRW 3 million for the same crime from the Pond Port Branch of the Daegu District Court on April 18, 2010, respectively, and on April 10, 2015, the same court was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Daegu District Court on December 3, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

On August 25, 2016, at around 20:45, the Defendant driven B B Poter, scoper, and faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-faf-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-g-

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a cargo under the influence of alcohol again.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting criminal investigations;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order - The defendant has a record of being punished several times for the same crime, the crime of this case was committed during the suspension period due to the previous conviction in the judgment, the high drinking level at the time of driving alcohol, and the favorable circumstances: the previous conviction in the judgment of the court is a crime of different types, and there was no record of the