A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 04:20 on March 16, 2019, the Defendant listened to the police officer D from the police officer assigned to the C district unit, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 to the effect that “A person who continues to cross his/her bath while continuing to do so” on the street B in front of the Won-si, 2019, and was called “Armbling” from the police officer assigned to the C district unit, “Armbling he/she was in Seoul, but he/she was in Seoul.” He/she was aware of the inside, and he/she tried to enter any part of the gate attached to the gate. He/she became aware of the inside and outside of this, and tried to stop the patrol and to stop the patrol, and to get off the dmbling from the police officer’s patrol, and to make the dmbling to the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 Report Handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, portrait, details of crimes, etc.);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;