logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고단3970
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant around July 21, 2017, around 03:10, around the C convenience store in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and "the drunkly drunk person fright within the convenience store."

“Around the 112 report to the head of the Dong-gu Seoul Police Station D police station, who was dispatched to the site, continued to express his/her intent, such as “I h. without any specific reason,” and demanded the head of the Dong-gu Police Station D police station to have his/her house on his/her house without any specific reason. While the Defendant was in the front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, the domicile of which the Defendant notified, was going to go to the Defendant in the direction of the patrol, the Defendant was in the vicinity of his/her domicile, he/she could prevent the said patrol from proceeding by closely exposing his/her body on the back of the driver’s seat of the said patrol vehicle, the said patrol is unfolded.

“I”, “I”, and “I”.

“Arrest” and “Arrest sea.”

The term "I", "I have been published," and "I have been personalized."

In light of the following, the police officer’s attitude appears to have been frightened by friending the above police officer’s sexual harassment: (a) and (b) and (c) and (d) and (e) and (e) and (e) and (e) and (e) the frighter were sent to the back seat.

"Abrance", "abrance, a motor vehicle in the Republic of Korea, is safe for the police.

The instant police officer was unable to drive the patrol vehicle while avoiding the disturbance for about 20 minutes with the desire and threat of “,” etc.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of crimes and 112 reporting and handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A CD who copied screen pictures;

1. Application of investigation reports (Supplement of police officers' statements of damage to police officers and violence-related Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is as follows: (a) the case is not less complicated in light of the content of the crime in this case; and (b) the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes; and (c) the defendant is also

arrow