A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “D” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) on March 23, 2018, the victim E (51 tax) and three male men in non-name; (c) while the victim took a game in the said game, the Defendant took a part in the said game; (d) while the victim took a part in the said game, he saw the excessive amount of 8cc in length of the knife, which is a deadly weapon at the main point of the said main point; and (e) put the above excessive amount of money to the knife of the victim; and (e) put the victim’s knife of money, which is a deadly weapon at the instant main point,

It shall be well discarded of fingers.

By intimidation, “the victim was unable to resist,” and the victim took a 600,000 won of cash owned by the victim from the victim so that the victim could not resist.

2. On March 24, 2018, the Defendant, at a cafeteria located in the G, which is located in the G, Suwon-si F, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si on March 24, 2018, “The G,” the Defendant, having recognized the morale of the day, added KRW 2 million to the victim;

The lost amount of money is empty, and the ludic acid bomb is prone.

The phrase " was frightened."

As above, Defendant 1 met 50,000 won at the same place from the victim who frightened the victim and frightened the victim.

“The” had a loan certificate drawn up and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. The photograph of the instrument of crime designated by the suspect at the time of voluntary accompanying;

1. Part 1 (No. 1) of the borrowed loan certificate seized / [No. 2] of the Defendant alleged that this part of the facts charged cannot be acknowledged since the Defendant did not have committed intimidation as stated in the facts charged in the judgment, but it is not reliable in that the victim E’s statement is very specific and alternative, consistent, and there is no other circumstance to suspect the Defendant. Thus, this part of the facts charged is sufficiently guilty.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is justified.