1. All claims filed by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the plaintiff.

Around November 2, 2007, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties entered into a land purchase services agreement with the Defendant regarding the number of parcels other than the F in Pakistan, and the Defendant did not pay the same money as stated in the purport of the claim out of the service cost under the above land purchase services agreement. As such, the Defendant filed a claim for the unpaid service payment.

On November 2, 2007, there is no dispute between the parties that the plaintiff and the designated parties entered into a land purchase services contract with the defendant for several parcels out of F on or around November 2, 2007, but further, it is insufficient to recognize that the defendant did not pay the plaintiff and the designated parties the money as stated in the purport of the claim out of the service price under the above land purchase services contract as a result of the written evidence Nos. 1 through 5 and the response of each tax submission order to the chief of the tax office having jurisdiction over the chief of the tax office having jurisdiction over the strike of this court.

Therefore, the claim of this case by the plaintiff and the designated parties is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.