1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. In light of the fact that the plaintiff (Appointed) who led the lawsuit of this case lost twice on the ground of clans in the previous lawsuit against the forest of this case, the defendant asserts that it cannot be deemed that the appointed party did not select the above A as the designated party based on the real will of the designated party, or that the representative of the plaintiffs did not grant the right to represent the lawsuit of this case to the representative of the plaintiffs based on the real will of the designated party.

In light of the following circumstances, Gap evidence No. 5 (including the provisional number) and the overall purport of the arguments, namely, the name, address, and resident registration number of the designated parties attached to the complaint of this case, and the seal of the designated parties is affixed to the right side of the letter of appointment of the party and the letter of delegation of the lawsuit of this case, and there is no other trace that the seal of the above plaintiffs was forged, and all the designated parties submitted a certificate of personal seal impression, it is reasonable to view that the designated parties appointed the above A as the designated parties based on their genuine intent, and the representative of the designated parties duly delegated the power of attorney in connection with the filing of the lawsuit of this case from the designated parties. Thus, the defendant's defense of this defense is without merit.

(1) The defendant asserted that the lawsuit of this case is contrary to the principle of no speech and good faith in light of the progress of the previous lawsuit, etc., but the defendant's assertion alone cannot be viewed as contrary to the principle of no speech and good faith, and thus, the above assertion cannot be accepted). 2. The decision on the merits of this case

A. The Gyeonggi-do K-Myeon Forest Survey report prepared during the Japanese colonial era is written as the owner’s “state” and the relative “L” with respect to the forest of this case, respectively, and the non-specing column is a blank.

In addition, the forest part drawing of the instant forest land as indicated in the forest land map is indicated as “L” without any overall title.

(2) M.