logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.11.13 2015고단2201
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from August 18, 2015 to August 22:47, 2015, when working as a mobile phone sales employee at the “E Handphone store operated by the victim D on the first floor of Changwon-si, the Defendant laid off one set of KRW 1,650,00 in cash, which is the victim’s possession at a small credit cooperative located under the Kabro-si, with KRW 1,650,00 in cash, KRW 100,00 in KRW 10,00 in KRW 0,00 in KRW 2,40,00 in total, KRW 0,00 in the market value of KRW 0,00 in KRW 2,40,00 in storage, KRW 0 in 0,00 in total, KRW 0,00 in the 0,00 in the 0,00 mobile phone market value, KRW 80,000 in the 0,000 mobile phone market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Details of products damaged;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning agency CCTV photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order [the scope of recommending punishment] There is no basic area (6 to 1.6 months) of types 2 (general larceny) (6 to 6 months) of general property [the decision of sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] although the defendant had been punished twice as a suspended sentence, it is recognized that the defendant committed the crime of this case although he was committed the crime of this case, it is recognized that he committed the crime of this case. The defendant is against his mistake, the defendant's handphones and merchandise couponss are returned to the victim, and the defendant's age

arrow