1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the defendant on July 7, 2014, and the defendant rendered a disposition to deny refugee status on July 24, 2015 on the ground that the plaintiff cannot be recognized as a refugee. The plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 7, 2015, but the above objection was dismissed on the same ground as the Minister of Justice on December 14, 2015. The decision to dismiss the objection was dismissed on the same ground, and the fact that the decision to dismiss the objection was notified to the plaintiff on January 5, 2016 can be acknowledged.

In addition, it is evident that the Plaintiff brought an action in this case seeking the cancellation of the above refugee non-recognition disposition on May 9, 2016, which was 90 days after the date of notification of the above decision of dismissal.

Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is not proper since it was filed after the period of filing the lawsuit under Article 20 (1) of the Administrative Litigation Act has expired.