1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1 through 3 and Eul evidence 1 through 3, the plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the defendant on January 13, 2014, the defendant issued a disposition to recognize refugee status on March 10, 2015 on the ground that the plaintiff cannot be recognized as a refugee on March 10, 2015, and the plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 3, 2015, but the above objection was dismissed on the same ground, and the decision to dismiss the appeal was rejected on March 23, 2016, and the fact that the plaintiff notified the plaintiff on May 4, 2016 can be acknowledged.

In addition, it is evident that the Plaintiff brought an action in this case seeking the cancellation of the above refugee non-recognition disposition on August 3, 2016, which was 90 days after the date of notification of the above decision of dismissal.

Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is not proper since it was filed after the period of filing the lawsuit under Article 20 (1) of the Administrative Litigation Act has expired.