1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant A is the building listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list;

B. Defendant B shall set out in attached list No. 2.

Facts of recognition

A. The Plaintiff entered into a contract to lease the pertinent building with the Defendants as listed below, and delivered the pertinent building at the time of the conclusion of the relevant lease contract.

Buildings indicated in paragraph (1) of attached Table 1 A, monthly rent of KRW 15,748,00 on January 3, 2017, and KRW 252,540 on KRW 22,540 on the 35,748,00 on January 3, 2017, and the building listed in paragraph (2) of attached Table 2, KRW 282,110 on October 14, 2015, and KRW 33,174,00 on September 20, 2017, and KRW 299,320 on KRW 44,00 on September 29, 2017, indicated in paragraph (4) of attached Table 4D on September 29, 2017, KRW 43,414,00 on KRW 296,297, KRW 405,00 on KRW 5,2105 E

B. However, the Defendants did not pay the difference under the above lease agreement for more than three months, which constitutes grounds for termination as stipulated in the above lease agreement.

C. The Plaintiff expressed his intent to terminate the above lease contract by serving a duplicate of the complaint of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition]

(a) Defendant B: Facts without any dispute, entries in Gap’s evidence 1 through 3 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings;

B. The remaining Defendants: According to the facts of the above recognition of confession (Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act), since the above lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants was terminated lawfully, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the pertinent building to the Plaintiff, barring any special circumstances.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.