The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked.

As of September 21, 2019, the Defendant common category I and II for the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 31, 2012, the Plaintiff has been engaged in private taxi business after acquiring the qualification for private taxi driver.

B. On August 5, 2019, at around 13:20, the Plaintiff driven a H private taxi (hereinafter “Plaintiff-si”) and transferred the C ginseng distance front C in front of the Suwon-si, Suwon-si to the smooth direction of the water station from the surface of the water station in the direction of the water station.

At that time, E, while driving a F G company taxi (hereinafter referred to as "victim taxi") and driving the F G company in the direction of the water station in the direction of the water station in the direction of the water station in the direction of the water station, she reported the Plaintiff taxi that entered the direction of the course, and she saw the Plaintiff taxi that entered the direction of the course and let the Plaintiff taxi walk for the light.

After diving, the plaintiff taxi driven three lanes in the direction of the water station (the bus stopped in three lanes before the moving direction) in the direction of the water station (the bus stopped in order to get passengers getting on and off).

After that, the plaintiff taxi was trying to enter the affected taxi in the future while driving a two-lane, and the damaged taxi was prevented from entering the third-lane of the plaintiff taxi while raising the speed of the damaged taxi.

Since then, the plaintiff taxi was placed in a two-lane for the plaintiff taxi, and the damaged taxi was placed in a three-lane direction for each water source, and it was stopped as at the intersection of the Suwon Station.

(hereinafter referred to as "the Plaintiff's act of entering the affected taxi in the future by rapidly changing the lane from the three lanes to the two lanes as above and the act of intending to enter the affected taxi in the future of the next three lanes is called the act of driving in the case (hereinafter referred to as "the act of intending to enter the taxi").

The Plaintiff, as to the instant driving act, threatened E using a motor vehicle, which is a dangerous object, by putting the damaged taxi into the three-lane in mind at the intervals of sounding the string of light and pushing the damaged taxi into the string of light. On the other hand, the Plaintiff: (a) kiddd the damaged taxi with a two-lane in which the damaged taxi is moving into the three-lane course; and (b) when the damaged taxi was changed into the three-lane course; and (c) posing a threat of being pushed into the three-lane course.