1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network B to the Plaintiff

A. The Selection C shall be 42,725,842 won and the amount among them shall be 19.1

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As indicated in the table below, the Plaintiff guaranteed B’s loan obligations from financial institutions, thereby repaying the principal and interest of the loan to the relevant financial institution on behalf of B, and as of November 29, 2015, the agreed item amount to be paid by B to the Plaintiff according to the guarantee contract between B and the Plaintiff is as listed in the following table:

No. 64, 207.36, 207.36, 207.46, 207.36, 207.46, 30, 207.46, 30, 207.46, 30, 207.40, 30, 207.40, 30, 207.46, 205, 30, 240, 240, 207. 30, 207, 30, 206. 40, 40, 240, 40, 200, 240, 207. 31, 208, 845, 29, 207, 205, 30, 204, 205, 205, 207, 304, 27, 298, 294

B. On September 10, 2013, B died and succeeded to B by the designated parties C and their children, and the remaining designated parties succeeded to B. On November 19, 2013, the Defendant (appointed parties) and the designated parties were subject to a qualified acceptance trial by this Court No. 2013-Ma247.

C. Meanwhile, the percentage of damages for delay designated by the Plaintiff based on the guarantee agreement between the Plaintiff and B is 12% per annum since December 17, 2012.

[Grounds for recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1-9 (including branch numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above findings of the determination, the following facts are within the scope of property inherited from B to the Plaintiff, and the Selection C is within the scope of property inherited from B (=156,61,423 x 3/11 x less than the original unit (hereinafter the same applies).

[) As to the Defendant (Appointed Party) (Appointed Party A, Appointed D, E, and F, KRW 28,483,895, respectively (=156,61,423 x 2/11), and KRW 12,874,429 x 70,809,363 x 3/111 x 2.2.