logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.05 2015가단11914
구상금
Text

1. To the extent of the property inherited from the network B to the Plaintiff:

A. The Selection C shall be 43,269,387 won and 17.2

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 6, 2001, the Plaintiff, a management institution of the Agricultural and Fishery Credit Guarantee Fund, concluded each contract with B and ① 14,800,000 won of the guaranteed amount, and the guarantee period from December 6, 2001 to December 6, 2006, ② from May 30, 2001, with the guarantee period of KRW 50,000,000 of the guaranteed amount, and the guarantee period from May 30, 2001 to May 30, 2006, ③ the guarantee period of KRW 27,00,000,000 of the guaranteed amount on June 22, 2003, and the guarantee period of KRW 27,00,000 from June 22, 2003 to June 1, 2005.

B. After that, the Plaintiff, under the guarantee of the Plaintiff under each of the above agreements, paid KRW 14,80,000 from the Jeju wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal w 200,000 from the Han wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal wal 205.

C. The Plaintiff’s claim for indemnity due to each of the said subrogated payments is KRW 158,654,418 (in total, KRW 94,52,277, such as the balance of subrogated payment, KRW 64,102, KRW 141) as of July 5, 2015, and the rate of damages for delay applicable from July 6, 2015 to the claim for indemnity payment is 12% per annum.

On the other hand, as of April 11, 2014, B died on the part of his co-inheritors C, D, E, F, and Defendant (Appointed Party) inherited the aforementioned liability for reimbursement against the Plaintiff by their respective shares. On July 9, 2015, the Jeju District Court rendered a judgment to accept the report of qualified acceptance by the said co-inheritors from the Jeju District Court as of July 9, 2015.

【Fact-finding without a dispute over the ground for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1 (each number omitted), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff is within the scope of property inherited from the deceased B, and the Selection C is equivalent to the inherited shares of the above amount of reimbursement 43,269,387 Won 158,654.

arrow