logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.05.23 2017가합37997
유급처분 및 제적처분 무효확인 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

A. On March 1, 2009, the Plaintiff entered the department of medical college established and managed by the Defendant (hereinafter “C medical department”).

B. The Plaintiff was subject to the first paid disposition on August 14, 2012, on the ground that he/she received each F grade in the “NEM” and “ENG” during the first semester in 2012, and was subject to the second paid disposition on January 20, 2014 on the ground that the average horizontal point of the essential subject was less than 1.75 (hereinafter “second paid disposition”) and the average horizontal point of the essential subject was less than 2.01 in the second paid disposition on the ground that he/she received NN-passssssss from the “HEA” during the second semester in 2015, and that the Plaintiff received NN-Ms’ second paid disposition on the ground that he/she received NN-Mssssss from the “3 paid disposition” (hereinafter “third paid disposition”). The Plaintiff was subject to the second paid disposition on February 13, 2016, and the Plaintiff was subject to the second two and subsequent assessment on the pertinent subject.

Considering the circumstances that passed by, the Plaintiff was determined to be paid by the unanimous opinion of all the professors present at the meeting, and on February 1, 2016, the Plaintiff was removed from the register for the primary reason.

(hereinafter “instant exclusion Disposition”). C.

In relation to the 2 and 3 paid dispositions against the Plaintiff and the instant expulsion disposition, the title of the C's Regulations on the C's School Regulations or the School Affairs related to the C's expulsion has been changed to the "Rules on the C's School Affairs," and the Addenda still refers to the "school Regulations."

(including amendments), the details of the Cuniversity regulations, etc. are as follows:

The evaluation of academic achievement under Article 25 (Evaluation of Performance) of the Regulations of the C Body amended in 2006 shall be classified into Grade A, A0, A-B, B0, B-B, C, C0, C- C-, C-, D-, D0, D-D-, and F as specified in Article 45 (1) of the Regulations of the C University, and the indication thereof shall be as follows:

The falling of Article 26 (Promotion) shall be as follows:

arrow