The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a resident who resides in C Apartment 106.

On August 4, 2013, the Defendant, at around 17:10, damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by the following: (a) although there was no fact that the victim embezzled the profit from apartment, etc. at the time of the tenant representative meeting for 4 years before the victim D’s 4 years ago; (b) in order to communicate with the election commission, at the 20 residents of the mother, “the victim got to drink the same money for 10 years.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of report on investigation (specific suspect) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (the conversion of 50,000 won into one day) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the punishment to be postponed: 700,000 won, the same criminal records do not exist, and the fact that the criminal facts are recognized and are in profoundly reflected, etc.);