The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who was the representative of B apartment units during the period from June 15, 2014 to September of the same year.

1. On July 9, 2014, the Defendant, around 08:00, damaged the reputation of the victim D by openly pointing out false facts to “D only once during one year, at the time of the instant apartment site 107 parking lot located in the boiler room,” which read, “D was present only once during the first year, and as well as by securing a single set of evidence for the business operators to have his/her branch office.” The Defendant, at the same time, damaged the reputation of the victim D by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On July 25, 2014, at around 21:30 on July 25, 2014, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the said victim by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out the following false facts: “The Defendant, from March 2013, 2013, DC, which was the second president of the apartment management office, demanded KRW 300,000,000,00 to the lower bidder at the time of subscribing to the apartment fire insurance policy.”

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case constitutes Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim submitted a written withdrawal of complaint to this court on March 3, 2015, the date of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.