1. The defendant (Appointeds) and the appointed parties shall be one story of cement structure C C and pent roof, respectively, to each plaintiff.

The facts that the Defendant (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Defendant”) and the designated parties jointly possess C wood structure cement and 81.98 square meters of a single house of the branch roof (hereinafter “instant building”) in light of the name of the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff do not conflict between the parties, and thus, the Defendant and the designated parties are obligated to deliver the instant building to each Plaintiff, barring any special circumstance.

In regard to this, the defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties asserted to the effect that E (the spouse of the defendant) had living together with D in the building of this case for the purpose of the F, which is the F, which is the lives of D'ttter with D, and therefore, they cannot comply with the plaintiff's claim of this case. However, the defendant and the designated parties did not relate to the right to occupy the building of this case, and thus, the defendant and the designated parties did not constitute a ground for rejecting the plaintiff's claim of delivery of the building of this case. Thus, the above argument by the defendant and the designated parties is

Therefore, the defendant and the designated parties have the duty to deliver the building of this case to each plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.