logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.05.12 2017고단286
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 16, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Cheongju District Court’s Support on the Cheongju District Court. On September 3, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a year of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Cheongju District Court.

[2] On April 2, 2017, at around 02:43, the Defendant: (a) driven a benz car under the influence of alcohol with a maximum alcohol content of 0.181% at a section of about 100 meters, starting on the front of a new glar loan with a large number of 12-lane 32,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Notice of the result of crackdown on driving drinking;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. On-site photographs;

1. The driver's license ledger and the driver's license ledger;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiry of criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (verification of the same criminal suspect's records);

1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts (a) of the Act on the Road Traffic, inasmuch as the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had been subject to punishment for driving under drinking alcohol once by driving under influence, one-time imprisonment with prison labor, or one-time suspension of execution of imprisonment with prison labor, the risk of recidivism is high, and thus, the Defendant is seriously punished. However, the Defendant shall be punished by a fine in a lump sum, taking into account the following: (a) the confession of and his/her depth against the Defendant; and (b) the fact that the final crime was committed in the past seven years prior to

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow