logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.12.06 2018고단1349
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On January 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for occupational embezzlement at the Seoul Southern District Court (Seoul Southern District Court) and on August 14, 2012, the Defendant was released from prison to prison in Seoul Southern District Court on parole on August 24, 2012 and completed the term of imprisonment on October 24, 2012.

[] The Defendant, along with B and C, conspired to acquire money by gathering investors with the purport that it may impose a large amount of money when investing funds to realizing the government underground funds of the past regime. The facts do not confirm the substance of the government underground funds of the past regime in the past among the above people, and in a correct way, it did not confirm who is possible to impose a large amount of money, and even if he did not receive an investment money under the above pretext, the Defendant is able to bring a profit of KRW 2 billion by realizing the government underground funds if he invests money, and the Defendant is able to receive an investment money under the above pretext, although he did not have the intent or ability to bring a large amount of money to investors, and the Defendant is able to receive an investment amount of KRW 5 billion from the victim F (age 64 years of age) in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City to receive an investment amount of KRW 1,500,000,000,000,000 from the above 2.5 billion.

Accordingly, the defendant should be considered as KRW 18.5 million by deceiving the victim in collusion with B and C in sequence.

shall be acquired by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G, H and B;

1. The actual authenticity is recognized only with respect to part of the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by the prosecutor, in which the defendant denies the actual authenticity of the defendant.

arrow