logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.11.16 2017고단842
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s fine of 5,00,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 10,000,000 won, and Defendant C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On January 21, 2016, A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for fraud at the Seoul Eastern District Court on January 21, 201, and the judgment was finalized on December 8 of the same year.

Defendant A, on March 12, 2015, shows the list of land in which K and 5 parcels of land and 22 additional parcels are attached to the victim from the victim J's office located in Ansan-si (I 607) during the period of Ansan-si on March 12, 2015, and Defendant A, “In the course of carrying out a loan with this real estate as collateral, the seizure of various taxes, etc. should be first arranged.

The reason was that lending KRW 50,000 to KRW 50,000 was the immediate cancellation of seizure and lending KRW 500,000 upon receipt of the loan, and that the credit will be opened and provided at KRW 3,000,000.

However, the Defendant did not know L, which is the owner of the above real estate, and there was no intention or ability to obtain a loan of KRW 500 million as security or to open a trade credit of KRW 3 billion.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the above victim and obtained the delivery of KRW 50 million from the victim to the victim.

"2017 Highest 1834"

1. Defendant B, Defendant C, and C, together with the name “M”, did not intend or have the ability to pay a large amount of money to investors even if they receive an investment under the said name even if they did not confirm the substance of the government underground funds in the past, and in a way, did not confirm the amount of money in the past among the above people, they did not have any intention or ability to pay a large amount of money to investors even if they receive an investment under the said name, because they did not confirm who would not have verified the substance of the government underground funds in the past.

Nevertheless, one is named.

arrow