1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

. The request was made;

- - Standard Sheet rocking and Typting Walls - Review of Quantity Total Sheet - review of a concrete structure (including drawings) structure for the maintenance and management of ditches, such as earth and sand dredging, etc. - Formulation of a detailed structure (gambling rocking, day-to day-day) plan - even if the site is a public road installed in the village on the confirmation sheet among supplementary documents, prior to its land category and the ditch owner claims the property right thereon, and submission of documents proving the right to use and profit from the land must be made.

(e).

In accordance with the above request for supplementation, the Plaintiff submitted a plan for the reduction of the tax base level of gambling car and the opening wall, and the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s application on May 21, 2015 for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Reasons for rejection: Supplementary measures to be taken on May 4, 2015 without being submitted : documents that can prove the right to use and benefit from a private road from the site of the application for the establishment of an access road in C in the project plan - documents that can prove the right to use and benefit from a private road from the private road (based on recognition), documents that can prove the right to use and benefit from a private road from the site of the application for the establishment of an access road in C in the project plan - documents that are not disputed by the general Do, even though the size of the gambling car is 1500*1500, 2100.

2. Determination on this safety defense

A. Upon filing the instant application, the Plaintiff filed an application for setting the period of use from April 2015 to April 2016. Since the date of closing the argument in the instant case had already been set on April 2016 at the time of closing the argument, there was no legal interest to seek the revocation of the instant disposition.

B. At the time of the filing of the suit, the benefit of the protection of rights was all met, and the administrative disposition subject to cancellation after the filing of the suit is effective.