1. On February 16, 2016, the Defendant’s application for approval of factory extension filed against the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Details of the disposition

On July 23, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of factory extension (hereinafter “instant application”).

The content of the condition that there is no change in the interest rate of 18-97,95 square meters in Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, 18-59,95 square meters in the interest rate of Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, 18-9, 95 square meters in the interest rate of Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the product manufacturing facilities incidental to the site for manufacturing facilities: ① The expert's proposal for reducing malodors generated from the existing factory (hereinafter referred to as the "factory of this case") was submitted, and the defendant held the Urban Planning Committee (Article 2) on October 23, 2015, and the following decision was made with respect to the application for review by the Urban Planning Committee.

On December 10, 2015, the Plaintiff submitted supplementary results to the Defendant for the aforementioned deliberation terms.

(2) On January 15, 2016, the defendant held the First City Urban Planning Committee (Sub-committee 2) on January 2016, 2016. On the instant application as a result of the deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee, the following conditional acceptance was made:

On January 19, 2016, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to take corrective measures according to the results of the deliberation by the Urban Planning Committee (hereinafter “instant supplementary measures”).

On January 28, 2016, the Plaintiff made a promise to not install a structure, including a single temporary building, on the site to be expanded.