logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2012.12.26 2012고단4262
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case was around 13:17 on May 20, 2002, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by a road management authority by loading and operating freight exceeding the restricted storage weight of B-owned freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s duties at the 14th line of the Royang-gun, Seoyang-gun, Ulsan-si, Ulsan National Highway, the Dolsan National Road.

2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on October 28, 2010 that "if an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under Article 83 (1) 2 shall also be imposed on the corporation in violation of the Constitution." Accordingly, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) applied by the public prosecutor to the facts charged in the case of this case is retroactively invalidated pursuant to the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, is not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow