logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2012.12.26 2012고단4352
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 7, 2003, the Defendant violated the Defendant’s vehicle operation restriction by loading and operating freight exceeding the total weight of the freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in excess of the total weight of the freight vehicles owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business, at the examination room for maintenance of 14 lines of the Seoyang-gun National Road of Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si. The Defendant violated the Defendant’s vehicle operation restriction.

2. The part of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in this case, "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which is subject to a fine under the relevant Article, of the Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merged)."

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime and thus not guilty under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow