logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 01. 31. 선고 2017두66725 판결
(심리불속행) 양도소득 귀속자가 원고가 아니라는 주장은 이유 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu69675 (20 September 20, 2017)

Title

(Trial Disorder) The argument that the Plaintiff is not a person to whom capital gains accrue is groundless.

Summary

In the event that the registration of ownership transfer of real estate has been completed (the main point of original trial), not only the third party but also the previous owner is presumed to have acquired ownership by legitimate grounds for registration.

Related statutes

Article 97 (Calculation of Necessary Expenses for Transfer Income)

Cases

Supreme Court-2017-Du 66725 Decided capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

AA

Defendant, Appellant

O Head of tax office

original adjudication determination

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu69675 Decided December 20, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal is recognized as without merit under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow