Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Criminal facts

1. At around 04:00 on January 1, 2014, the Defendant issued an order for food with E restaurant F, etc. working as an employee by Yansan-gu C, an employee, and then called “Ieng-gu” to “Ieng-gu, the president, and the president”, “Ieng-gu, Ieng-do,” the Defendant called “Ieng-gu, me to see the horse answer that D would not work properly.” On the other hand, the Defendant continued to consider the victim G as an employee, and took a bath by considering the victim G, and received the victim G from G, and then came to the left-hand part of G in the front-hand way.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the Victim G as above.

2. The Defendant: (a) at the time and time indicated in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property damage: (b) at the restaurant operating the victim H, the restaurant as indicated in the preceding paragraph, and (c) at the same time, the Defendant 1, the wife of the above H, who was in the account room, called the victim’s seat; (c) was aware of the contact; and (d) was rejected, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s seated 75,000 won in the aggregate of the market price of the victim’s seated at that place, and destroyed the victim’s seated 75,00 won in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol of statement of the prosecution against D and the protocol of statement of the police against G, H and I;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of each investigation report and evidential materials attached thereto to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of a fine for negligence for the crime of this case (the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and reflects in depth the mistake, the defendant agreed smoothly with the victim H and deposited considerable money for the victim G);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;