beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.05 2014누60650
영업정지처분취소
Text
1. The plaintiff's successor's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.
purport.
Reasons
The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the appeal by the plaintiff succeeding intervenor is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.