beta
Cases
2014Do6142 A. Violation of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry
(b) Violation of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act;
Defendant
1. Large forest industry stock company;
2. Hyundai Construction Company.
Appellant
Defendants
Defense Counsel
Attorney Park Jong-soo (for defendant Dae-soo, Corporation)
Attorney AB, D, AC (for Defendant Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd.)
Judgment of the lower court
Gwangju District Court Decision 2013Do2814 Decided April 30, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
October 27, 2014
Text
All appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendants guilty of all the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the violation of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade
Of the grounds of appeal by Defendant Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., the allegation that there was an error of law in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the number of crimes in the judgment below is not a ground of appeal, or that the court below did not consider it as a subject of judgment ex officio, and thus,
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Shin Young-chul
Justices shall award and decoration.
Justices Kim Chang-suk
Justices Cho Jong-hee