A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 30, 2018, from around 23:30 to 0:00 the following day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the vicinity of the C/S and D’s hospital located in the Si of Gunsan to the victim E, a nurse on night duty at night in the instant hospital (hereinafter “neither 37 years of age,” and (b) sounded “the sick room inside the hospital,” and opened in the wheelchairs in front of the said hospital; (c) the victim “Is any infant hospitalized in the sick room, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is, Is,” and (d) the victim was interfered with the victim’s duty by force outside the hospital’s name or sick room.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place set forth in Paragraph 1, insultingd the victims by openly insulting the victims on the spot where 112 police officers, who were the police officers of the Jeonbuk-gun Police Station, sent out after receiving a report of 112 during the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (1), and two patients, etc. of the above hospital, are located in the night-time nurse E and the above hospital, and the victim J. of the above hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, J and I;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant reflects the crime, that the victim of the obstruction of business has agreed smoothly with the victim, and that the defendant has committed contingent acts during the commission of business.