beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B is an employee in charge of accounting of corporation D in Gunsan City, and the defendant A is the representative of corporation F in Gunsan City E.
1. The Defendant B’s personal information manager may not provide a third party with personal information without the consent of the subject of information, even though it does not constitute an exception under the Personal Information Protection Act, such as where there are special provisions in the Act or where it is inevitable to comply with the statutory obligations
Nevertheless, around 10:48 September 26, 2017, Defendant B received contact from Defendant A to inform him of his personal information, such as his resident registration number, etc. from Defendant A at the office of the said Co., Ltd., and in the past G received and processed the personal information from G at the time of the said corporation’s work in D.
G’s resident registration number and address were sent to Defendant A by text without G’s consent.
Accordingly, Defendant B provided personal information to a third party without the consent of the subject of information.
2. Although there is no special provision in an Act or it is inevitable to comply with the statutory obligations, Defendant A shall be provided with personal information with the knowledge that the personal information manager provides the personal information without obtaining the consent of the subject of information, such as cases where there is no exception prescribed in the Personal Information Protection Act
Nevertheless, on September 26, 2017, Defendant A received a transmission of G’s resident registration number, address, and address, despite being aware of the fact that Defendant B did not obtain the consent of G, in order to prosecute the Defendant B, who managed G’s personal information, for the purpose of paying the delayed wage in the above F, and committing one person’s demonstration.
Accordingly, Defendant A is aware of the fact that it is personal information without consent of the subject of information.