The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a BP car.

On May 12, 2014, around 03:25, the Defendant continued to go straight from the two-lanes of movable distance to the two-lanes of movable distance from the two-lanes of movable distance to the new interest distance.

At night and in such a case, a driver engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to ensure safe operation by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brake system of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and brought the victim C (30 years of age) prior to driving a bicycle on the right side of the road by negligence, which led to shocking the victim C (30 years of age) in front of the left side of the vehicle driving by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered a serious injury on the part of the victim due to the above occupational negligence, which caused the permanent disorder due to damage to the mid-to 14 weeks old boundary.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the written agreement of September 3, 2014, which was submitted after prosecution, the victim expressed an explicit intention not to punish the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.